From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NZt6w-0005ve-4u for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 16:38:10 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NZt6q-0005tu-Mv for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 16:38:09 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=43081 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NZt6q-0005tr-IA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 16:38:04 -0500 Received: from e39.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.160]:33150) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NZt6q-0006Sw-50 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 16:38:04 -0500 Received: from d03relay01.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay01.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.226]) by e39.co.us.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o0QLUXqB001712 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:30:33 -0700 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (d03av04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.170]) by d03relay01.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id o0QLbfi6142342 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:37:42 -0700 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id o0QLbelH002813 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:37:40 -0700 Message-ID: <4B5F60A3.6010205@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:37:39 -0600 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 01/10] qcow2: Fix error handling in qcow2_grow_l1_table References: <1263996186-6623-1-git-send-email-kwolf@redhat.com> <1263996186-6623-2-git-send-email-kwolf@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1263996186-6623-2-git-send-email-kwolf@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Kevin Wolf Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 01/20/2010 08:02 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote: > Return the appropriate error value instead of always using EIO. Don't free the > L1 table on errors, we still need it. > > Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf > Applied all. Thanks. Do you think this is stable-0.12 material? Is there any reasonable scenario where this could fix a user visible bug? Regards, Anthony Liguori