From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NaFfP-0006dY-Tk
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:43:15 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NaFfL-0006bw-9P
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:43:15 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=44744 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NaFfL-0006bs-6B
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:43:11 -0500
Received: from mail-iw0-f174.google.com ([209.85.223.174]:37311)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1NaFfK-0000g9-GI
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:43:10 -0500
Received: by iwn4 with SMTP id 4so16674iwn.18
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 13:43:07 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4B60B367.9000709@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:43:03 -0600
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 6/6] fix audio_bug related failures
References: <1264547685-21129-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>	<1264547685-21129-7-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>	<4B5FA0A3.30302@codemonkey.ws>
	<hjp9m4$qh3$1@ger.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <hjp9m4$qh3$1@ger.gmane.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On 01/27/2010 05:56 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 01/27/2010 03:10 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> What did clang complain about?  It's not obvious to me.
>
> It doesn't see that audio_bug returns cond, and gives quite a few 
> false positive in its callers.

Ah, this is a clang issue.  I'll have to defer to malc on this one.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

> Paolo
>
>
>
>