From: OHMURA Kei <ohmura.kei@lab.ntt.co.jp>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
ohmura.kei@lab.ntt.co.jp, avi@redhat.com
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] qemu-kvm: Wrap phys_ram_dirty with additional inline functions.
Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 19:22:18 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B6FE5DA.6000502@lab.ntt.co.jp> (raw)
We think access phys_ram_dirty through inline functions is better
than directly for encoupseling reason.
We devided the ram in a 64 pages block. Each block has a counter, which is
stored in phys_ram_dirty_by_word. It shows the number of dirty pages.
We will find the 64 pages block is dirty or non-dirty using
phys_ram_dirty_by_word.
Signed-off-by: OHMURA Kei <ohmura.kei@lab.ntt.co.jp>
---
cpu-all.h | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
cpu-defs.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cpu-all.h b/cpu-all.h
index 8ed76c7..2251f14 100644
--- a/cpu-all.h
+++ b/cpu-all.h
@@ -168,6 +168,33 @@ typedef union {
} CPU_QuadU;
#endif
+static inline unsigned long unroll_flags_to_ul(int flags)
+{
+ unsigned long ret = 0, flags_ul = (unsigned long)flags;
+
+#if TARGET_LONG_SIZE == 4
+ ret |= flags_ul << 0;
+ ret |= flags_ul << 8;
+ ret |= flags_ul << 16;
+ ret |= flags_ul << 24;
+#elif TARGET_LONG_SIZE == 8
+ ret |= flags_ul << 0;
+ ret |= flags_ul << 8;
+ ret |= flags_ul << 16;
+ ret |= flags_ul << 24;
+ ret |= flags_ul << 32;
+ ret |= flags_ul << 40;
+ ret |= flags_ul << 48;
+ ret |= flags_ul << 56;
+#else
+ int i;
+ for (i = 0; i < sizeof(unsigned long); i++)
+ ret |= flags_ul << (i * 8);
+#endif
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
/* CPU memory access without any memory or io remapping */
/*
@@ -847,6 +874,7 @@ int cpu_str_to_log_mask(const char *str);
extern int phys_ram_fd;
extern uint8_t *phys_ram_dirty;
+extern int *phys_ram_dirty_by_word;
extern ram_addr_t ram_size;
extern ram_addr_t last_ram_offset;
extern uint8_t *bios_mem;
@@ -882,6 +910,11 @@ static inline int cpu_physical_memory_is_dirty(ram_addr_t addr)
return phys_ram_dirty[addr >> TARGET_PAGE_BITS] == 0xff;
}
+static inline int cpu_physical_memory_get_dirty_flags(ram_addr_t addr)
+{
+ return phys_ram_dirty[addr >> TARGET_PAGE_BITS];
+}
+
static inline int cpu_physical_memory_get_dirty(ram_addr_t addr,
int dirty_flags)
{
@@ -890,9 +923,50 @@ static inline int cpu_physical_memory_get_dirty(ram_addr_t addr,
static inline void cpu_physical_memory_set_dirty(ram_addr_t addr)
{
+ if (phys_ram_dirty[addr >> TARGET_PAGE_BITS] != 0xff)
+ ++phys_ram_dirty_by_word[(addr >> TARGET_PAGE_BITS) /
+ TARGET_LONG_BITS];
+
phys_ram_dirty[addr >> TARGET_PAGE_BITS] = 0xff;
}
+static inline int cpu_physical_memory_set_dirty_flags(ram_addr_t addr,
+ int dirty_flags)
+{
+ if ((phys_ram_dirty[addr >> TARGET_PAGE_BITS] != 0xff) &&
+ ((phys_ram_dirty[addr >> TARGET_PAGE_BITS] | dirty_flags) == 0xff))
+ ++phys_ram_dirty_by_word[(addr >> TARGET_PAGE_BITS) /
+ TARGET_LONG_BITS];
+
+ return phys_ram_dirty[addr >> TARGET_PAGE_BITS] |= dirty_flags;
+}
+
+static inline void cpu_physical_memory_mask_dirty_range(ram_addr_t start,
+ int length,
+ int dirty_flags)
+{
+ int i, mask, len, *pw;
+ uint8_t *p;
+
+ len = length >> TARGET_PAGE_BITS;
+ mask = ~dirty_flags;
+ p = phys_ram_dirty + (start >> TARGET_PAGE_BITS);
+ pw = phys_ram_dirty_by_word + (start >> TARGET_PAGE_BITS) /
+ TARGET_LONG_BITS;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
+ if (p[i] == 0xff)
+ --pw[i / TARGET_LONG_BITS];
+ p[i] &= mask;
+ }
+}
+
+int cpu_physical_memory_get_dirty_range(ram_addr_t start, ram_addr_t end,
+ int dirty_flags);
+
+int cpu_physical_memory_get_non_dirty_range(ram_addr_t start, ram_addr_t end,
+ int dirty_flags);
+
void cpu_physical_memory_reset_dirty(ram_addr_t start, ram_addr_t end,
int dirty_flags);
void cpu_tlb_update_dirty(CPUState *env);
diff --git a/cpu-defs.h b/cpu-defs.h
index cf502e9..8e89e96 100644
--- a/cpu-defs.h
+++ b/cpu-defs.h
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@
#endif
#define TARGET_LONG_SIZE (TARGET_LONG_BITS / 8)
+#define TARGET_LONG_ALIGN(addr) (((addr) + TARGET_LONG_BITS - 1) / TARGET_LONG_BITS)
/* target_ulong is the type of a virtual address */
#if TARGET_LONG_SIZE == 4
--
1.6.3.3
next reply other threads:[~2010-02-08 10:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-08 10:22 OHMURA Kei [this message]
2010-02-11 12:42 ` [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 1/3] qemu-kvm: Wrap phys_ram_dirty with additional inline functions Avi Kivity
2010-02-12 2:08 ` OHMURA Kei
2010-02-13 7:33 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-15 5:05 ` Yoshiaki Tamura
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B6FE5DA.6000502@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--to=ohmura.kei@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).