From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NeSzp-0008W6-BY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2010 07:45:45 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=38813 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NeSzo-0008Ve-Ml for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2010 07:45:44 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NeSzm-0004H5-C0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2010 07:45:44 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:19205) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NeSzl-0004Gk-Qi for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2010 07:45:42 -0500 Message-ID: <4B70076D.3010306@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 13:45:33 +0100 From: Gerd Hoffmann MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] pci: initialize header type register. References: <20100208064147.GD22624@valinux.co.jp> <20100208101753.GA14662@redhat.com> <4B6FF203.6010304@redhat.com> <20100208111614.GD15957@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20100208111614.GD15957@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: Blue Swirl , Isaku Yamahata , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 02/08/10 12:16, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 12:14:11PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: >> On 02/08/10 11:17, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>> On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 03:41:47PM +0900, Isaku Yamahata wrote: >>>> initialize header type register in pci generic code. >>>> >>>> Cc: Blue Swirl >>>> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" >>>> Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata >>> >>> No objections here, I am assuming this will be followed >>> by patches removing header type init from bridges? >>> From qdev perspective, it is probably cleaner to make >>> multifunction bit a separate qdev property though, right? >> >> From a qdev perspective it would make *alot* of sense to move a bunch of >> pci config stuff (including, but not limited to header type) into >> PCIDeviceInfo. >> >> cheers, >> Gerd > > It's an Ack then? Yes, count it as ack. It is a move into the right direction, and the fact that more cleanups can/should be done here shouldn't hold it up. cheers, Gerd