qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: OHMURA Kei <ohmura.kei@lab.ntt.co.jp>,
	mtosatti@redhat.com,
	"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH v2] qemu-kvm: Speed up of the dirty-bitmap-traveling
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:55:50 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B72D706.3070602@codemonkey.ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B72B28E.6010801@redhat.com>

On 02/10/2010 07:20 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 02/10/2010 12:52 PM, OHMURA Kei wrote:
>   
>> dirty-bitmap-traveling is carried out by byte size in qemu-kvm.c.
>> But We think that dirty-bitmap-traveling by long size is faster than by byte
>> size especially when most of memory is not dirty.
>>
>> --- a/bswap.h
>> +++ b/bswap.h
>> @@ -209,7 +209,6 @@ static inline void cpu_to_be32wu(uint32_t *p, uint32_t v)
>>  #define cpu_to_32wu cpu_to_le32wu
>>  #endif
>>  
>> -#undef le_bswap
>>  #undef be_bswap
>>  #undef le_bswaps
>>   
>>     
>
> Anthony, is it okay to export le_bswap this way, or will you want
> leul_to_cpu()?
>   

Oh, I see what's happening here. Yes, I think a leul_to_cpu() makes more
sense.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-02-10 15:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-10 10:52 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] qemu-kvm: Speed up of the dirty-bitmap-traveling OHMURA Kei
2010-02-10 13:10 ` [Qemu-devel] " Ulrich Drepper
2010-02-10 13:20 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-10 15:54   ` Anthony Liguori
2010-02-10 15:57     ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-10 16:00     ` Alexander Graf
2010-02-10 16:35       ` Anthony Liguori
2010-02-10 16:43         ` Alexander Graf
2010-02-10 16:46           ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-10 16:47             ` Alexander Graf
2010-02-10 16:52               ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-10 16:54                 ` Alexander Graf
2010-02-10 16:43         ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-10 15:55   ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
2010-02-12  2:03     ` OHMURA Kei
2010-02-14 12:34       ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-15  6:12         ` OHMURA Kei
2010-02-15  8:24           ` Alexander Graf
2010-02-16 11:16             ` OHMURA Kei
2010-02-16 11:18               ` Alexander Graf
2010-02-17  9:42                 ` OHMURA Kei
2010-02-17  9:46                   ` Alexander Graf
2010-02-18  5:57                     ` OHMURA Kei
2010-02-18 10:30                       ` Alexander Graf
2010-02-17  9:47                   ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-17  9:49                     ` Alexander Graf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B72D706.3070602@codemonkey.ws \
    --to=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
    --cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=ohmura.kei@lab.ntt.co.jp \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).