From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NfFhj-0003f4-5N for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:46:19 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=40859 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NfFhi-0003eT-6b for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:46:18 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NfFhf-0002xV-SM for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:46:17 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:14136) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NfFhf-0002xB-73 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:46:15 -0500 Message-ID: <4B72E2D2.7010701@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 18:46:10 +0200 From: Avi Kivity MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH v2] qemu-kvm: Speed up of the dirty-bitmap-traveling References: <4B728FF9.6010707@lab.ntt.co.jp> <4B72B28E.6010801@redhat.com> <4B72D69D.7050005@codemonkey.ws> <4B72D838.9060603@suse.de> <4B72E051.8090008@codemonkey.ws> <4B72E224.1090901@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <4B72E224.1090901@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alexander Graf Cc: Anthony Liguori , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , mtosatti@redhat.com, OHMURA Kei , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" On 02/10/2010 06:43 PM, Alexander Graf wrote: > >> Out of curiousity, why? It seems like an odd interface. >> >> > Because on PPC, you usually run PPC32 userspace code on a PPC64 kernel. > Unlike with x86, there's no real benefit in using 64 bit userspace. > btw, does 32-bit ppc qemu support large memory guests? It doesn't on x86, and I don't remember any hacks to support large memory guests elsewhere. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function