From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Nfu33-00032M-Qk
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 06:51:01 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45458 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nfu33-00032E-6j
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 06:51:01 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim
	4.60) (envelope-from <kwolf@redhat.com>) id 1Nfu32-0007OM-3k
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 06:51:00 -0500
Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:57732)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <kwolf@redhat.com>) id 1Nfu31-0007Nx-NQ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 06:50:59 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28])
	by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <kwolf@redhat.com>) id 1Nftwu-0001Ba-N4
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 06:44:41 -0500
Message-ID: <4B753EF1.6040001@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 12:43:45 +0100
From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Qemu does not pass pressed caps lock to client
References: <b0ae6fcc1002111313j56b57aa4tb90a7697d8877283@mail.gmail.com>
	<4B752548.1040108@redhat.com>
	<b0ae6fcc1002120309ya8e9160p414e94d9875c7956@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <b0ae6fcc1002120309ya8e9160p414e94d9875c7956@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Shahar Havivi <shaharh@gmail.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, bdrung@ubuntu.com

Am 12.02.2010 12:09, schrieb Shahar Havivi:
> It's not true that SDL is not sending up event like the comment say,
> 
> On Fedora 12 it behave like a toggle button, first press/release will send
> caps-down event second press/release send caps-up event
> 
> On Ubuntu 9.10 it work like any other key, i.e. pressing caps will generate two
> events down and up.

So I think we have this situation:

Without patch: F12 works, Ubuntu 9.10 broken
With your patch: F12 broken, Ubuntu 9.10 works

I dont' consider fixing one system by breaking another one a solution...
Do we know why this difference exists? Is there a way to check at
runtime which mode SDL uses?

Have you tested if num lock has the same behaviour or are you just assuming?

Kevin