From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, shaharh@gmail.com, kwolf@redhat.com
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: Qemu does not pass pressed caps lock to client
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 13:39:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B754C04.4080907@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b0ae6fcc1002120309ya8e9160p414e94d9875c7956@mail.gmail.com>
On 02/12/2010 12:09 PM, Shahar Havivi wrote:
> It's not true that SDL is not sending up event like the comment say,
>
> On Fedora 12 it behave like a toggle button, first press/release will send
> caps-down event second press/release send caps-up event
>
> On Ubuntu 9.10 it work like any other key, i.e. pressing caps will generate two
> events down and up.
True. To see why, start at
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=317010 and
http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/libs/libsdl1.2/libsdl1.2_1.2.13-4ubuntu4.diff.gz
-- it's a nice code reading exercise, so I'll suggest a possible
solution before pointing out the reason for this behavior. The solution
would be to put hack after hack, i.e. something like this (untested):
case 0x3a: /* caps lock */
/* SDL will usually send only 2 events instead of 4, so we
generate the missing ones. However, on Debian/Ubuntu
systems it may generate 4; in this case we have to discard
the extra events. On Debian/Ubuntu ev->key.keysym.mod
will always be zero, but for other systems we need the
complicated condition below. */
if ((ev->key.keysym.mod & KMOD_CAPS) ==
(ev->type == SDL_KEYDOWN ? KMOD_CAPS : 0)) {
kbd_put_keycode(keycode);
kbd_put_keycode(keycode | 0x80);
}
return;
case 0x45: /* num lock */
/* Same as above. */
if ((ev->key.keysym.mod & KMOD_NUM) ==
(ev->type == SDL_KEYDOWN ? KMOD_NUM : 0)) {
kbd_put_keycode(keycode);
kbd_put_keycode(keycode | 0x80);
}
return;
Now, the solution of the riddle. The patch was correctly submitted as
+ SDL_UseLockKeys = getenv ("SDL_DISABLE_LOCK_KEYS") == NULL;
...
+ use_lock_keys = SDL_UseLockKeys;
...
+ if (!use_lock_keys)
+ break;
(i.e. by default do not change anything) but the maintainer apparently
morphed it into
+ SDL_UseLockKeys = getenv("SDL_DISABLE_LOCK_KEYS");
...
+ use_lock_keys = ( SDL_UseLockKeys && *SDL_UseLockKeys );
...
+ if ( ! use_lock_keys )
+ break;
which changed the default and the meaning of SDL_DISABLE_LOCK_KEYS.
I initially thought about removing the caps lock/num lock hack
altogether and add the following, however it would need SDL 1.2.14
because SDL_NO_LOCK_KEYS support was added exactly two months after
1.2.13 was released. :-( :-(
/* There are two versions around of a Debian patch that changes the
way Caps Lock and Num Lock are handled. The first version
by default sends only one of the KeyDown/KeyUp events, unless
SDL_DISABLE_LOCK_KEYS is present in the environment. The second
version instead by default sends both events, unless
SDL_DISABLE_LOCK_KEYS is present and not empty. This version
is the most commonly found (and a totally braindead idea).
Upstream instead supports SDL_NO_LOCK_KEYS which, if set to 1,
will generate all four events---which is what we want. Luckily,
there is a combination of environment variable that will satisfy
all variant. */
putenv ("SDL_DISABLE_LOCK_KEYS", "");
putenv ("SDL_NO_LOCK_KEYS", "1");
Yes, I love Debian.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-12 12:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-11 21:13 [Qemu-devel] Qemu does not pass pressed caps lock to client Shahar Havivi
2010-02-12 9:54 ` Kevin Wolf
2010-02-12 11:09 ` Shahar Havivi
2010-02-12 11:43 ` Kevin Wolf
2010-02-12 12:39 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2010-02-12 15:15 ` [Qemu-devel] " Anthony Liguori
2010-02-12 18:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2010-02-12 18:44 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-02-12 20:49 ` Dustin Kirkland
2010-02-13 11:21 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B754C04.4080907@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=shaharh@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).