From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NhOig-0007or-3G for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 09:48:10 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=44308 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NhOie-0007ob-OY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 09:48:08 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NhOid-0004A4-Fz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 09:48:08 -0500 Received: from mail-vw0-f45.google.com ([209.85.212.45]:45291) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NhOic-00049w-Nv for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 09:48:07 -0500 Received: by vws17 with SMTP id 17so280025vws.4 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 06:48:06 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4B7AB01E.8010407@codemonkey.ws> Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 08:47:58 -0600 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20100216080412.GC15022@x200.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20100216080412.GC15022@x200.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for Feb 16 List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Chris Wright Cc: Arnd Bergmann , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org On 02/16/2010 02:04 AM, Chris Wright wrote: > Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering. > I'm not sure we'll have the right audience for this discussion, but: - macvtap vs. raw; my understanding is that we can achieve roughly the same thing with macvtap as with raw, since macvtap doesn't have the same security considerations as raw, is this a better strategy? Regards, Anthony Liguori > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >