From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Nj7zf-00087E-Gi for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2010 04:20:51 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45977 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nj7zf-00086x-4H for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2010 04:20:51 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Nj7ze-0000if-KT for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2010 04:20:51 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:38931) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Nj7ze-0000iR-7F for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2010 04:20:50 -0500 Message-ID: <4B80FAEF.7060804@redhat.com> Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 11:20:47 +0200 From: Avi Kivity MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/9] qemu-kvm: Extended use of upstream code List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Kiszka Cc: Anthony Liguori , Marcelo Tosatti , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Gleb Natapov On 02/19/2010 08:22 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: > Spin-off from my longer series as Marcelo asked for the last patch as > the next step. I don't see any value in reordering the series, so I just > but off the lower bits. > > This part mostly cleans up common KVM code that is also present > upstream. It also includes the fixed guest debug writeback, first for > upstream (patch 8 should be queued into uq/master as well), then merged > into qemu-kvm while dropping the qemu-kvm copy of the guest debugging > code. > > The differences to previous postings of the full series are: > - rebased over qemu-kvm > - fixed guest state writeback to avoid conflicts with SET_VCPU_EVENTS, > rather use them on modern kernels (I know Gleb will hate me for this, > but I'm convinced it's cleaner that way) > > Applied all, some issues pointed out as reply to individual patch. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function