From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NjFre-0004Mk-NZ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2010 12:45:06 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=53152 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NjFre-0004MH-Bo
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2010 12:45:06 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim
	4.60) (envelope-from <Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com>) id 1NjFrd-0007ad-Fz
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2010 12:45:06 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:24201)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com>) id 1NjFrd-0007Zg-1b
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 21 Feb 2010 12:45:05 -0500
Message-ID: <4B817117.1020700@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 18:44:55 +0100
From: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] QEMU e820 reservation patch
References: <4B79857A.1030808@redhat.com> <4B7EFC74.10209@codemonkey.ws>
In-Reply-To: <4B7EFC74.10209@codemonkey.ws>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: Kevin O'Connor <kevin@koconnor.net>, QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>

On 02/19/10 22:02, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Acked-by: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
>
> Would be nice to use git-send-email in the future as your attachments
> are often rendered poorly by mail clients.

Just switching over from quilt to git, and still having issues with
git-send-email. It does some things nicely, other things are a pain in
the b**t with it, especially for single patch submissions.

> I noticed that you use this for the TSS page with EPT but you don't use
> this interface for the rest of memory. I'm curious what you think the
> right long term split is? If QEMU is not managing the full e820 table,
> can we reasonable add entries on our own?

I'd like to have QEMU handle more, I picked the TSS page because we
changed the location of that in the past and it was the one that
triggered my patch in the first place. Now we have the infrastructure,
it will be easier to add more.

Cheers,
Jes