From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NjfxT-0001Gn-Oy
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:36:51 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=49429 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NjfxT-0001Gc-6Z
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:36:51 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim
	4.60) (envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1NjfxS-0003QJ-2u
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:36:51 -0500
Received: from mail-qy0-f188.google.com ([209.85.221.188]:60689)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1NjfxR-0003QF-SC
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:36:49 -0500
Received: by qyk26 with SMTP id 26so2238365qyk.12
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 13:36:49 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4B82F8ED.6000303@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 15:36:45 -0600
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20100221172358.GH4894@arachsys.com> <4B82462A.7050903@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <4B82462A.7050903@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: qemu-kvm 0.12.2 VNC segfault
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Chris Webb <chris@arachsys.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org

On 02/22/2010 02:54 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 02/21/2010 07:23 PM, Chris Webb wrote:
>> Some sort of race where a client disconnects and is removed from the 
>> client
>> list while the vnc_refresh() loop is iterating over it, maybe?
>
> Looks like c727a05459, and high time for 0.12.3.  Anthony?

Indeed.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori