From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Nl1Kt-0001kA-BF
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 09:38:35 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35328 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nl1Ks-0001jr-Qb
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 09:38:34 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim
	4.60) (envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1Nl1Kr-00006T-Lj
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 09:38:34 -0500
Received: from mail-iw0-f194.google.com ([209.85.223.194]:60843)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1Nl1Kr-00006E-9f
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 09:38:33 -0500
Received: by iwn32 with SMTP id 32so128850iwn.18
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 06:38:32 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4B87DCE3.2020406@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 08:38:27 -0600
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <cover.1267122331.git.mst@redhat.com>
	<af686d9630f18829e4e2ba1333a198efea1126b6.1267122331.git.mst@redhat.com>
	<m31vg9m91m.fsf@trasno.mitica> <20100226143242.GA23359@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20100226143242.GA23359@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCHv2 09/12] vhost: vhost net support
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: amit.shah@redhat.com, kraxel@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>

On 02/26/2010 08:32 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> and
>> --enable-vhost/--disable-vhost options.
>>
>>      
> I don't really see why we need --enable-vhost/--disable-vhost.
> Runtime flag is enough.
>    

So that packagers can disable features at build time that they don't 
want to support.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori