From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>
Cc: Chris Wright <chrisw@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for Mar 16
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 11:43:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B9F52D4.2030208@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100316092944.GB23617@redhat.com>
On 03/16/2010 11:29 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 10:18:03AM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:
>
>> Chris Wright<chrisw@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering.
>>>
>> Migration:
>> - flexible migration: I hope to sent an RFC patch on time for the
>> call. idea is to use subsections.
>>
>> - callbacks. block migration introduced several callbacks:
>> * cancel()
>> * get_status()
>> * release()
>> in spice we need now another to callbacks: on_start() and on_end().
>> * on_start(): tells spice that migration has started (it will then
>> manage certificates, passwords, ... itself)
>> * on_end(): it is called when migration ends. spice use it to
>> transparently connect to the new host and user don't have to "reconnect"
>>
>> - what to do on migration error:
>> - target side: libvirt folks want the program to print a message if
>> it fails. Current code spent 100% cpu time doing select on a closed
>> fd. (patches already on the list to make it wait without using
>> cpu).
>>
> No, that is not correct. We want QEMU to exit when incoming migration
> fails. Printing to stderr is just something that will end up in the
> logs for admin to further diagnose the problem if required. There is
> nothing to be gained by leaving QEMU running, and everything to loose
> since the failed migration may have left it in a dangerous state from
> which you do not want to attempt incoming migration again.
>
> If we really want to leave it running when migration fails, then we're
> going to have to add yet another QMP event to inform libvirt when
> migration has finished/failed, and/or make 'query_migrate' work on
> the destination too.
>
A qmp event seems the logical thing to do? Exiting can happen for many
reasons, a qmp event is unambiguous.
>> - source side: current behaviour if migration fails is to stop the
>> vm. We have requests to make it continue (remember that this is
>> live migration). what to do? adding a paramenter like the block
>> layer:
>> migration_error=[stop|continue]
>> any better ideas.
>>
> A parameter to the 'migrate' monitor command would be the logical
> place if we needed this configurable.
>
> Incidentally I have a feeling we might need to introduce a migration
> event in QMP. Currently libvirt polls on the 'query_migrate' command
> to get the ongoing migration status. This means there can be a delay
> in detecting completion as long as the polling interval - for this
> reason we just dropped libvirt's polling time from 1/2 sec to 50ms
> to ensure prompt detection.
>
Whenever you implement a polling loop, can you send an event to qemu-devel@?
Polling loops are an indication that something is wrong.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-16 9:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-16 7:01 [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for Mar 16 Chris Wright
2010-03-16 9:18 ` [Qemu-devel] " Juan Quintela
2010-03-16 9:29 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2010-03-16 9:43 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2010-03-16 10:31 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2010-03-16 10:38 ` Avi Kivity
2010-03-16 10:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-03-16 10:45 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2010-03-16 11:16 ` Avi Kivity
2010-03-16 15:05 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-03-16 15:23 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2010-03-16 15:46 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-03-16 10:09 ` Daniel P. Berrange
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B9F52D4.2030208@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=chrisw@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).