From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NrwHb-0004qN-1J
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 12:39:47 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=43339 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NrwHa-0004pW-BQ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 12:39:46 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim
	4.60) (envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1NrwHX-0003jo-Ej
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 12:39:45 -0400
Received: from mail-pw0-f45.google.com ([209.85.160.45]:49148)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1NrwHW-0003jU-SU
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 12:39:43 -0400
Received: by pwi9 with SMTP id 9so869306pwi.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 09:39:37 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4BA105C7.6030806@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 11:39:35 -0500
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] [TRIVIAL] usb-linux: remove unreachable
	default in switch statement
References: <1268053115.2130.4.camel@localhost.localdomain>	
	<4BA0FC66.6080307@codemonkey.ws>
	<1268842456.2231.6.camel@localhost.localdomain>
In-Reply-To: <1268842456.2231.6.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>

On 03/17/2010 11:14 AM, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-03-17 at 10:59 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>    
>> On 03/08/2010 06:58 AM, Paul Bolle wrote:
>>      
>>> Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle<pebolle@tiscali.nl>
>>>
>>>        
>> Applied.  Thanks.
>>      
> Paul Brook was "tempted to replace it by an abort()" (about one and a
> half week ago). Did you perhaps miss that message or weren't you tempted
> to do this?
>    

I missed it, but then again, I don't think the patch was wrong in the 
first place.

I think we use too many aborts/exits in the device model that can 
potentially be triggered by guest code.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

> Regards,
>
>
> Paul Bolle
>
>