qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: OHMURA Kei <ohmura.kei@lab.ntt.co.jp>
To: "kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Cc: ohmura.kei@lab.ntt.co.jp, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
	Yoshiaki Tamura <tamura.yoshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] virtio_blk_load() question
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 13:30:02 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BA1AC4A.2070402@lab.ntt.co.jp> (raw)

Hi,

I have a question regarding virtio_blk_load().
(qemu-kvm.git d1fa468c1cc03ea362d8fe3ed9269bab4d197510)

VirtIOBlockReq structure is linked list of requests, but it doesn't seem to be
properly linked in virtio_blk_load().
...
req->next = s->rq;
s->rq = req->next;
...
In this case, we're losing req, and s->rq always point to be same entry.
If I'm understanding correctly, s->rq is NULL initially,
and this would be kept.

Although I'm not sure how these requests should be ordered, if the requests
should be added to the head of list to restore the saved status by
virtio_blk_save(), I think the following code is correct.  However, it seems to
reverse the order of the requests, and I'm wondering whether that is
appropriate.

Would somebody tell me how virtio_blk_load() is working?

diff --git a/hw/virtio-blk.c b/hw/virtio-blk.c
index b80402d..267b16f 100644
--- a/hw/virtio-blk.c
+++ b/hw/virtio-blk.c
@@ -457,7 +457,7 @@ static int virtio_blk_load(QEMUFile *f, void *opaque, int version_id)
        VirtIOBlockReq *req = virtio_blk_alloc_request(s);
        qemu_get_buffer(f, (unsigned char*)&req->elem, sizeof(req->elem));
        req->next = s->rq;
-        s->rq = req->next;
+        s->rq = req;
    }

    return 0;

             reply	other threads:[~2010-03-18  4:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-18  4:30 OHMURA Kei [this message]
2010-03-18  7:37 ` [Qemu-devel] Re: virtio_blk_load() question Juan Quintela
2010-03-18  9:42   ` OHMURA Kei
2010-03-18 12:07     ` Juan Quintela
2010-03-19  2:53       ` OHMURA Kei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4BA1AC4A.2070402@lab.ntt.co.jp \
    --to=ohmura.kei@lab.ntt.co.jp \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=tamura.yoshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).