From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Nti8B-0007Dh-VR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:57:24 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=60935 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nti8B-0007DR-GS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:57:23 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Nti87-0002nK-G2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:57:23 -0400 Received: from david.siemens.de ([192.35.17.14]:22348) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Nti87-0002nA-1B for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:57:19 -0400 Message-ID: <4BA77738.3090901@siemens.com> Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:57:12 +0100 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20100322061658.GC20376@localhost> <4BA7745A.3040402@siemens.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: Build always fail on x86_32 host for i386_softmmu target List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Juan Quintela Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , Bruce Majia Juan Quintela wrote: > Jan Kiszka wrote: >> Juan Quintela wrote: >>> Bruce Majia wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> When I built qemu on my x86_32 host with following configure line: >>>> >>> try to do first a: >>> make distclean >>> >>>> $ ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/qemus/master \ >>>> --target-list=i386-softmmu >>>> $ make >>> there are several config.h & config.mak around (from old builds) you >>> need to remove then 1st. >> Doesn't the fact that this is required for a proper rebuild indicate >> some issue in the build system? I just recall a recent multi-hour >> debugging session of mine which turned out to be due to an inconsistent >> build after moving forward in the git history (in qemu-kvm, but the code >> change came from upstream). Or are there some fundamentally unresolvable >> scenarios so that a distclean is mandatory after every git update? > > Humm, no, it should only happens if you update from a _very_ old qemu > (very old means something between qemu-0.11 - 0.12). > > If you had need it after 0.12, it is a different bug and should be fixed. > I think I tried to reproduced this, but I failed after purging the buggy output directory (out-of-tree build): http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.kvm.devel/47499 Maybe you are luckier than I :), or we have to wait for the next issue to come. Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1 Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux