From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Nu2MZ-0004XH-7l for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 07:33:35 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=58948 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nu2MY-0004Vu-0z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 07:33:34 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Nu2MU-0008NJ-0u for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 07:33:32 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f228.google.com ([209.85.219.228]:52778) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Nu2MR-0008MI-9Q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 07:33:27 -0400 Received: by ewy28 with SMTP id 28so1038413ewy.16 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 04:33:23 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <4BA8A6FF.4020308@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:33:19 +0100 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20100322212524.GA75169@triton8.kn-bremen.de> <20100323022726.GB14049@hall.aurel32.net> <20100323090344.GA28611@volta.aurel32.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: git head broken? (x86 softmmu w/o kvm) List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Markus Armbruster Cc: Blue Swirl , Juergen Lock , Aurelien Jarno , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 03/23/2010 11:06 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote: > Aurelien Jarno writes: > >> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 03:27:26AM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: >>> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 10:25:24PM +0100, Juergen Lock wrote: >>>> Hi! >>>> >>>> I just wanted to make another FreeBSD qemu git head snaphot port update, >>>> and found both i386-softmmu and x86_64-softmmu no longer boot, they seem >>>> to hang early in the bios before it prints anything, last tb seems to be >>>> this loop: >>>> >>> >>> A quick bisect revealed it has been broken by this patch: >>> >> >> I have just pushed a patch to fix the problem. > > Thanks. > > I can't see the offending on the mailing list. Was it committed without > review? It was actually a series of 20-odd patches. Patches with a laudable goal, but also some of them quite risky. Paolo