From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Nx419-0004cP-50 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 15:55:59 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=58915 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nx417-0004a6-Ri for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 15:55:58 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nx413-0004f2-U2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 15:55:57 -0400 Received: from mail-pz0-f171.google.com ([209.85.222.171]:57060) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nx413-0004ew-PH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 15:55:53 -0400 Received: by pzk1 with SMTP id 1so344813pzk.18 for ; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 12:55:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4BB3A8C6.1040407@codemonkey.ws> Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 14:55:50 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] vhost: fix features ack References: <20100331182031.GA5200@redhat.com> <4BB393CF.1040700@codemonkey.ws> <20100331153805.03ee142e@redhat.com> <20100331190753.GA6914@redhat.com> <4BB3A183.8000905@codemonkey.ws> <20100331192553.GB3274@redhat.com> <4BB3A461.5090101@codemonkey.ws> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Blue Swirl Cc: Luiz Capitulino , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" On 03/31/2010 02:54 PM, Blue Swirl wrote: > >> This refactoring effort isn't really paying attention to improving >> interfaces which I think is a bit problematic. >> > I agree, but with improved memory API, the questionable byte swapping > could be eliminated from devices. Do you plan to finish your earlier > RFC patches? Were there problems with them? > It's a matter of figuring out a way to do it that makes everyone happy :-) Regards, Anthony Liguori