From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NxlgJ-0003z7-Fw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 14:33:23 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=40038 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NxlgF-0003wx-TS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 14:33:23 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NxlgD-0001s5-BL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 14:33:19 -0400 Received: from mail-bw0-f224.google.com ([209.85.218.224]:39761) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NxlgD-0001rv-4n for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 14:33:17 -0400 Received: by bwz24 with SMTP id 24so2011973bwz.17 for ; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 11:33:16 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <4BB63869.9090301@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2010 20:33:13 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1270227919-31031-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <4BB62A74.6090109@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] provide a stub version of kvm-all.c if !CONFIG_KVM List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Blue Swirl Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 04/02/2010 08:17 PM, Blue Swirl wrote: > I merged your patch and mine. Does it still look reasonable? Yes, of course. I'd rather see them committed separately though. Paolo