From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Nz6Ym-0000Qw-Qi for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 07:03:08 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=34485 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nz6Yl-0000Qh-JN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 07:03:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nz6Yj-0003o9-2V for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 07:03:06 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:51126) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nz6Yi-0003nr-QA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 07:03:05 -0400 Message-ID: <4BBB14C0.6050906@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 13:02:24 +0200 From: Kevin Wolf MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH]: block: get rid of the BDRV_O_FILE flag References: <20100405145357.GA25954@lst.de> In-Reply-To: <20100405145357.GA25954@lst.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Am 05.04.2010 16:53, schrieb Christoph Hellwig: > This patch requires Kevin's "[PATCH] Replace calls of old bdrv_open" to > be applied first. Now that this is starting again, let's avoid the annoyance we had the last time when patches were held back because they depended on patches which depended on other patches... I have applied your patches to my work branch at git://repo.or.cz/qemu/kevin.git block, let's base the next patches on that branch. Maybe I should even give that branch some testing and send a pull request for Anthony. Kevin