From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1O2Cdl-0006DC-Sq
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 20:09:05 -0400
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=55979 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O2Cdk-0006D2-HG
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 20:09:05 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1O2Cdj-00040T-Bx
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 20:09:04 -0400
Received: from mail-bw0-f215.google.com ([209.85.218.215]:57952)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1O2Cdj-0003za-61
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 20:09:03 -0400
Received: by bwz7 with SMTP id 7so778184bwz.16
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Wed, 14 Apr 2010 17:08:59 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Paolo Bonzini <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4BC65909.9030404@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 02:08:41 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20100414233217.GD17857@hall.aurel32.net>
In-Reply-To: <20100414233217.GD17857@hall.aurel32.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: Call for help in reviewing patches (!kvm &
	linux-user)
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On 04/15/2010 01:32 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> My impression is that few persons have interest in linux-user or
> non-KVM targets areas, at least from the development point of view.
> I personally don't care about linux-user code, though I have tried to
> merge patches in this area anyway, as otherwise they are just
> bitrotting on the mailing list.
>
> On the other hand there are quite more people at least following the
> development in these areas, as when something is broken, you are usually
> told that quite quickly.

Let's start by fixing what is broken.  Last time I checked iothread was 
broken.  If it's fixed, there was as usual no trace of the patches on 
the list...

You get kudos for posting all your patches, unlike many other 
committers, besides the work reviewing and applying ours.

Paolo