From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1O5EuK-0002cm-4T
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 05:10:44 -0400
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=33134 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O5EuD-0002Qy-U7
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 05:10:43 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <jan.kiszka@web.de>) id 1O5DF3-0004Hg-9o
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 03:24:39 -0400
Received: from fmmailgate03.web.de ([217.72.192.234]:40704)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <jan.kiszka@web.de>) id 1O5DF3-0004GR-0j
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 03:24:01 -0400
Message-ID: <4BD14B05.3050301@web.de>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 09:23:49 +0200
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <201004222338.06194.michael@walle.cc>
In-Reply-To: <201004222338.06194.michael@walle.cc>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="------------enigC7ACC88034408210AD612FDF"
Sender: jan.kiszka@web.de
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: Commit 9c9bb6c89d4 breaks code execution from flash
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enigC7ACC88034408210AD612FDF
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Michael Walle wrote:
> Hi Jan,
>=20
> your commit "Optimize consecutive CFI02 writes by remapping memory lazi=
ly"=20
> breaks the code execution from flash.
>=20
> If you write to the flash, the flash will switch into I/O mode. Now if =
code is=20
> executed from this flash, a cpu_abort will be raised ("Trying to execut=
e code=20
> outside RAM or ROM").
>=20

Hmm, guess I didn't test execute-in-place back then. Do you happen to
have a test case for this scenario? I'll look into this.

Jan


--------------enigC7ACC88034408210AD612FDF
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkvRSwoACgkQitSsb3rl5xSkAgCg3iGcPrDVAbxDflk8sJ8v5J10
y08An0a+fQMZ4SvX0cjTNtOJdFxYz7o6
=prOK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enigC7ACC88034408210AD612FDF--