Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [libvirt] Libvirt debug API

[Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>]

On 04/26/2010 04:46 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>> (3) The system management application can certainly create whatever 
>>> context it wants to launch a vm from.  It's comes down to who's 
>>> responsible for creating the context the guest runs under.  I think 
>>> doing that at the libvirt level takes away a ton of flexibility from 
>>> the management application.
>>
>> If you want to push the flexibility slider all the way to the right 
>> you get bare qemu.  It exposes 100% of qemu capabilities.  And it's 
>> not so bad these days.  But it's not something that can be remoted.
>
> As I mentioned earlier, remoting is not a very important use-case to me.
>
> Does RHEV-M actually use the remote libvirt interface?  I assume it'll 
> talk to vdsm via some protocol and vdsm will use the local libvirt API. 

Yes.

> I suspect most uses of libvirt are actually local uses.

I expect the same, though I'm sure a design goal was to make use of 
libvirt be reasonable through the remote API.  If we aren't able to 
fulfil it, much of the value of libvirt goes away.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function