From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Cc: Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org>,
qemu-devel Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] [RESEND] Make char muxer more robust wrt small FIFOs
Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 08:44:09 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BE024A9.2040904@codemonkey.ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1271782566-16420-1-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de>
On 04/20/2010 11:56 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> Virtio-Console can only process one character at a time. Using it on S390
> gave me strage "lags" where I got the character I pressed before when
> pressing one. So I typed in "abc" and only received "a", then pressed "d"
> but the guest received "b" and so on.
>
> While the stdio driver calls a poll function that just processes on its
> queue in case virtio-console can't take multiple characters at once, the
> muxer does not have such callbacks, so it can't empty its queue.
>
> To work around that limitation, I introduced a new timer that only gets
> active when the guest can not receive any more characters. In that case
> it polls again after a while to check if the guest is now receiving input.
>
> This patch fixes input when using -nographic on s390 for me.
>
I think this is really a kvm issue. I assume it's because s390 idles in
the kernel so you never drop to userspace to repoll the descriptor.
A timer is a hacky solution. You really need to use an io thread to
solve this and then you need to switch away from qemu_set_fd_handler2 to
qemu_set_fd_handler() and make sure that the later breaks select
whenever it's invoked.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
> ---
>
> Please consider for stable.
> ---
> qemu-char.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/qemu-char.c b/qemu-char.c
> index 05df971..ce9df3a 100644
> --- a/qemu-char.c
> +++ b/qemu-char.c
> @@ -235,6 +235,7 @@ typedef struct {
> IOEventHandler *chr_event[MAX_MUX];
> void *ext_opaque[MAX_MUX];
> CharDriverState *drv;
> + QEMUTimer *accept_timer;
> int focus;
> int mux_cnt;
> int term_got_escape;
> @@ -396,6 +397,13 @@ static void mux_chr_accept_input(CharDriverState *chr)
> d->chr_read[m](d->ext_opaque[m],
> &d->buffer[m][d->cons[m]++& MUX_BUFFER_MASK], 1);
> }
> +
> + /* We're still not able to sync producer and consumer, so let's wait a bit
> + and try again by then. */
> + if (d->prod[m] != d->cons[m]) {
> + qemu_mod_timer(d->accept_timer, qemu_get_clock(vm_clock)
> + + (int64_t)100000);
> + }
> }
>
> static int mux_chr_can_read(void *opaque)
> @@ -478,6 +486,8 @@ static CharDriverState *qemu_chr_open_mux(CharDriverState *drv)
> chr->opaque = d;
> d->drv = drv;
> d->focus = -1;
> + d->accept_timer = qemu_new_timer(vm_clock,
> + (QEMUTimerCB*)mux_chr_accept_input, chr);
> chr->chr_write = mux_chr_write;
> chr->chr_update_read_handler = mux_chr_update_read_handler;
> chr->chr_accept_input = mux_chr_accept_input;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-04 13:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-20 16:56 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] [RESEND] Make char muxer more robust wrt small FIFOs Alexander Graf
2010-05-04 13:44 ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
2010-05-04 14:30 ` Alexander Graf
2010-05-04 14:34 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-05-04 16:01 ` Alexander Graf
2010-05-04 16:25 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-05-04 16:49 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-05-05 7:33 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
2010-05-05 8:08 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-05-05 12:46 ` Alexander Graf
2010-05-05 15:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] char: Flush read buffer in mux_chr_can_read Jan Kiszka
2010-05-11 16:22 ` [Qemu-devel] " Alexander Graf
2010-05-11 16:29 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-05-11 16:35 ` Alexander Graf
2010-05-12 18:51 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-05-14 16:00 ` Alexander Graf
2010-05-14 16:17 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-05-15 5:31 ` Alexander Graf
2010-05-15 8:36 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-05-15 8:37 ` Alexander Graf
2010-05-15 8:54 ` Jan Kiszka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BE024A9.2040904@codemonkey.ws \
--to=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=aurelien@aurel32.net \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=waldi@debian.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).