From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: Peter Lieven <pl@dlh.net>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Qemu-KVM 0.12.3 and Multipath -> Assertion
Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 16:01:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BE028BF.1000603@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BE02440.6010802@dlh.net>
Am 04.05.2010 15:42, schrieb Peter Lieven:
> hi kevin,
>
> you did it *g*
>
> looks promising. applied this patched and was not able to reproduce yet :-)
>
> secure way to reproduce was to shut down all multipath paths, then
> initiate i/o
> in the vm (e.g. start an application). of course, everything hangs at
> this point.
>
> after reenabling one path, vm crashed. now it seems to behave correctly and
> just report an DMA timeout and continues normally afterwards.
Great, I'm going to submit it as a proper patch then.
Christoph, by now I'm pretty sure it's right, but can you have another
look if this is correct, anyway?
> can you imagine of any way preventing the vm to consume 100% cpu in
> that waiting state?
> my current approach is to run all vms with nice 1, which helped to keep the
> machine responsible if all vms (in my test case 64 on a box) have hanging
> i/o at the same time.
I don't have anything particular in mind, but you could just attach gdb
and get another backtrace while it consumes 100% CPU (you'll need to use
"thread apply all bt" to catch everything). Then we should see where
it's hanging.
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-04 14:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-03 21:26 [Qemu-devel] Qemu-KVM 0.12.3 and Multipath -> Assertion Peter Lieven
2010-05-04 5:38 ` [Qemu-devel] " André Weidemann
2010-05-04 8:35 ` [Qemu-devel] " Kevin Wolf
2010-05-04 11:38 ` Peter Lieven
2010-05-04 12:20 ` Kevin Wolf
2010-05-04 13:42 ` Peter Lieven
2010-05-04 14:01 ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2010-05-04 17:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-05-18 11:13 ` Peter Lieven
2010-05-18 12:14 ` Kevin Wolf
2010-05-12 14:01 ` qemu-kvm hangs if multipath device is queing (was: Re: [Qemu-devel] Qemu-KVM 0.12.3 and Multipath -> Assertion) Peter Lieven
2010-05-14 9:26 ` [Qemu-devel] Re: qemu-kvm hangs if multipath device is queing Kevin Wolf
2010-05-18 11:10 ` Peter Lieven
2010-05-18 13:22 ` Kevin Wolf
2010-05-19 7:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-05-19 7:48 ` Kevin Wolf
2010-05-19 8:18 ` Peter Lieven
2010-05-23 10:30 ` Peter Lieven
2010-05-08 9:53 ` [Qemu-devel] Qemu-KVM 0.12.3 and Multipath -> Assertion André Weidemann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BE028BF.1000603@redhat.com \
--to=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pl@dlh.net \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).