From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1O9ZpM-0002T8-BA
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2010 04:19:32 -0400
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=38414 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O9ZpJ-0002SG-5P
	for Qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2010 04:19:30 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <kwolf@redhat.com>) id 1O9ZpH-0001ha-Sd
	for Qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2010 04:19:29 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:24079)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <kwolf@redhat.com>) id 1O9ZpH-0001gy-LM
	for Qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 05 May 2010 04:19:27 -0400
Message-ID: <4BE129F0.8000905@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 05 May 2010 10:18:56 +0200
From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [Commit 20d97356] Fix OpenBSD build
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
Cc: Qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Hi Blue Swirl,

did I miss the patch posted for this commit? I can't find it on the
mailing list. I think the BlockDriver declarations should really stay at
the end of the source file of each driver.

What about using a different way to get rid of the static forward
declaration, namely using bdrv_find_format() instead of referencing it
directly? If you agree I'll post patches to revert your change and use
this solution instead.

Kevin