From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=34982 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OCWaE-0006zh-1Y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 13 May 2010 07:28:12 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OCThK-0002KN-UP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 13 May 2010 04:23:16 -0400 Received: from fmmailgate01.web.de ([217.72.192.221]:47694) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OCT1t-0003sx-FF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 13 May 2010 03:40:25 -0400 Message-ID: <4BEBACE5.4010306@web.de> Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 09:40:21 +0200 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig47CAA8E29DE74F30CED711F7" Sender: jan.kiszka@web.de Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH, RFC 0/4] monitor device info infrastructure List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Blue Swirl Cc: qemu-devel This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig47CAA8E29DE74F30CED711F7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Blue Swirl wrote: > Hi all, >=20 > I finally refreshed some of my monitor patches. PCI and HPET patches > (attached, they don't apply anymore) need more work because of the new > monitor design. >=20 > The patches provide a method for devices to register new monitor > commands. This fixes some design problems, like useless > pic_info/irq_info functions for most architectures. >=20 > I think automation via qdev field was requested the last time. I added > something like this, though it doesn't fit the cases where several > functions need to be registered. >=20 > Comments? I'll soon send out a series that adds "device_show " to visualize the full state, something that will at least obsolete "info pic" and "info hpet" sooner or later, maybe even more. Also, I would like to qdev'ify CPUs in order to make them reachable for device_show (which evaluates qdev->info.vmstate). I'm not sure: How many use cases for a "dev_info" would remain? Moreover, to dump statistics, we should rather add some "device_stats " command instead of mixing both usages under an info command.= Jan --------------enig47CAA8E29DE74F30CED711F7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkvrrOUACgkQitSsb3rl5xRTmwCg7Ygcs06eYMOYeT6fBMI+uj3C qwkAoNg2BQsm8cGQuyLNLxeZoV8mH0D7 =4DG6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig47CAA8E29DE74F30CED711F7--