Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/2] Sheepdog: distributed storage system for QEMU

[Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>]

Am 13.05.2010 16:03, schrieb MORITA Kazutaka:
> To support snapshot in a protocol, I'd like to call the hander of the
> protocol driver in the following functions in block.c:
> 
>     bdrv_snapshot_create
>     bdrv_snapshot_goto
>     bdrv_snapshot_delete
>     bdrv_snapshot_list
>     bdrv_save_vmstate
>     bdrv_load_vmstate
> 
> Is it okay?

Yes, I think this is the way to go.

> In the case both format and protocol drivers support snapshots, I
> think it is better to call the format driver handler.  Because qcow2
> is well known as a snapshot support format, so when users use qcow2,
> they expect to get snapshot with qcow2.

I agree.

> There is another problem to make the sheepdog driver be a protocol;
> how to deal with protocol specific create_options?
> 
> For example, sheepdog supports cloning images as a format driver:
> 
>   $ qemu-img create -f sheepdog dst -b sheepdog:src
> 
> But if the sheepdog driver is a protocol, error will occur.
> 
>   $ qemu-img create sheepdog:dst -b sheepdog:src
>   Unknown option 'backing_file'
>   qemu-img: Backing file not supported for file format 'raw'
> 
> It is because the raw format doesn't support a backing_file option.
> To support the protocol specific create_options, if the format driver
> cannot parse some of the arguments, the protocol driver need to parse
> them.

That's actually a good point. Yes, I think it makes a lot of sense to
allow parameters to be passed to the protocol driver.

Also, I've never tried to create an image over a protocol other than
file. As far as I know, raw is the only format for which it should work
right now (at least in theory). As we're going forward, I'm planning to
convert the other drivers, too.

Kevin