From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=38779 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OCvaw-0005EF-Tw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2010 10:10:31 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OCvas-0000U5-3C for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2010 10:10:30 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:22256) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OCvar-0000Tv-R7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2010 10:10:26 -0400 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o4EEAO1O022803 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 14 May 2010 10:10:24 -0400 Message-ID: <4BED59B8.60903@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 16:10:00 +0200 From: Kevin Wolf MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1273746650-10518-1-git-send-email-berrange@redhat.com> <4BED06A4.7000206@redhat.com> <20100514110502.7e0da42e@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20100514110502.7e0da42e@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] Fix docs for block stats monitor command List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Luiz Capitulino Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Am 14.05.2010 16:05, schrieb Luiz Capitulino: > On Fri, 14 May 2010 10:15:32 +0200 > Kevin Wolf wrote: > >> Am 13.05.2010 12:30, schrieb Daniel P. Berrange: >>> The 'parent' field in the 'query-blockstats' monitor command is >>> part of the top level block device QDict, not part of the 2nd >>> level 'stats' QDict. >>> >>> * block.c: Fix docs for 'parent' field in block stats monitor >>> command output >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange >> >> Oops, you're right of course. >> >> Luiz, there was this patch that moved all the documentation to a >> different place and will conflict with this one. Should we fix the >> documentation on top of your patch or are you going to rebase? > > I'm going to rebase, have lots of stuff to fix in the doc. Alright, applied the patch to the block branch then. Kevin