From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=39691 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ODLDK-0006i1-BA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 15 May 2010 13:31:51 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ODLDI-00081q-Sk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 15 May 2010 13:31:50 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:53695) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ODLDI-000818-LD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 15 May 2010 13:31:48 -0400 Message-ID: <4BEEDA7E.7060805@redhat.com> Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 20:31:42 +0300 From: Avi Kivity MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <6e14cbfe3764b46d9bd6d2db61d41fd9c85dd54e.1273843151.git.jan.kiszka@siemens.com> <4BED9358.1000106@codemonkey.ws> <4BEE5F0F.2060600@web.de> <4BEE6035.2070906@redhat.com> <4BEE6254.6060701@web.de> In-Reply-To: <4BEE6254.6060701@web.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/8] Add QBuffer List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Kiszka Cc: Anthony Liguori , Juan Quintela , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Markus Armbruster , Luiz Capitulino On 05/15/2010 11:59 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote: > >> Is this __class__ stuff documented anywhere? >> >> > Not yet. Also, we should clarify the proposed private extension section > that only "__some_key" is reserved for downstream, not > '__some_other_key__' (i.e. downstream names must not end with '__'). > > Why use such weird names at all? What's wrong with 'class'? -- Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.