From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=38972 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ODy1i-0003xM-SQ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 May 2010 06:58:27 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <kraxel@redhat.com>) id 1ODy1h-0003Uh-IJ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 May 2010 06:58:26 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:59883)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <kraxel@redhat.com>) id 1ODy1h-0003UZ-At
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 May 2010 06:58:25 -0400
Message-ID: <4BF12149.4090603@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 12:58:17 +0200
From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Add QEMU DirectFB display driver
References: <1273856330-15161-1-git-send-email-julian.pidancet@citrix.com>
	<4BED8337.2000605@codemonkey.ws>
In-Reply-To: <4BED8337.2000605@codemonkey.ws>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: Julian Pidancet <julian.pidancet@citrix.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

   Hi,

> Can you provide some performance data to justify this since SDL provides
> the same ability?

IMHO no performance data is needed to justify this because SDL running 
on top of the linux framebuffer is simply unusable IMHO.

cheers,
   Gerd