From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=46595 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OEIsr-0001Vm-Od for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 May 2010 05:14:46 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OEIsl-0007gk-20 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 May 2010 05:14:41 -0400 Received: from zion.dlh.net ([91.198.192.1]:58512 helo=mail.dlh.net) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OEIsk-0007ge-TN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 May 2010 05:14:35 -0400 Message-ID: <4BF25A7A.1010305@dlh.net> Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 11:14:34 +0200 From: Peter Lieven MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Suggested Parameters for SLES 10 64-bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org Hi, we try to migrate some Suse Linux Enterprise 10 64-bit guests from abandoned Virtual Iron by Iron Port to qemu-kvm 0.12.4. Unfortunately the guests are not very stable by now. With ACPI they end up in a kernel panic at boot time and without they occasionally hang during boot or shortly after. Has anyone experience with suitable kvm and/or kernel parameters to get this stable? Thanks, Peter