From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=47645 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OEJrv-00017U-3m for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 May 2010 06:17:52 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OEJpW-0000lO-Uk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 May 2010 06:15:25 -0400 Received: from zion.dlh.net ([91.198.192.1]:33271 helo=mail.dlh.net) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OEJpW-0000lH-Is for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 May 2010 06:15:18 -0400 Received: from lieven2.kamp.de ([82.141.1.225] helo=[172.21.12.69]) by mail.dlh.net with asmtp (Exim 3.36 #24 (Debian)) id 1OEJpV-000255-00 for ; Tue, 18 May 2010 12:15:18 +0200 Message-ID: <4BF268B5.6080708@dlh.net> Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 12:15:17 +0200 From: Peter Lieven MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] VNC encoding ZLibHex? List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Hi, has someone enough background to say if it was worth implementing ZLibHex encoding to qemu/kvm? If yes, I would go for that. BR, Peter