From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=33978 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OEKkd-0008QZ-BT
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 May 2010 07:14:21 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <pl@dlh.net>) id 1OEKkW-0004CY-TX
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 May 2010 07:14:19 -0400
Received: from zion.dlh.net ([91.198.192.1]:58271 helo=mail.dlh.net)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <pl@dlh.net>)
	id 1OEKkW-0004CK-No
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 May 2010 07:14:12 -0400
Message-ID: <4BF27676.5000606@dlh.net>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 13:13:58 +0200
From: Peter Lieven <pl@dlh.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Qemu-KVM 0.12.3 and Multipath -> Assertion
References: <4BDF3F94.1080608@dlh.net> <4BDFDC44.9030808@redhat.com>
	<4BE00750.6040804@dlh.net> <4BE01120.30608@redhat.com>
	<4BE02440.6010802@dlh.net> <4BE028BF.1000603@redhat.com>
	<20100504170706.GA21339@lst.de>
In-Reply-To: <20100504170706.GA21339@lst.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org

hi,

will this patch make it into 0.12.4.1 ?

br,
peter

Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 04:01:35PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>   
>> Great, I'm going to submit it as a proper patch then.
>>
>> Christoph, by now I'm pretty sure it's right, but can you have another
>> look if this is correct, anyway?
>>     
>
> It looks correct to me - we really shouldn't update the the fields
> until bdrv_aio_cancel has returned.  In fact we cannot cancel a request
> more often than we can, so there's a fairly high chance it will
> complete.
>
>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
>
>   


-- 
Mit freundlichen Grüßen/Kind Regards

Peter Lieven

..........................................................................................................

   KAMP Netzwerkdienste GmbH
   Vestische Str. 89-91 | 46117 Oberhausen
   Tel: +49 (0) 208.89 402-50 | Fax: +49 (0) 208.89 402-40
   mailto:pl@kamp.de | http://www.kamp.de

   Geschäftsführer: Heiner Lante | Michael Lante
   Amtsgericht Duisburg | HRB Nr. 12154
   USt-Id-Nr.: DE 120607556

.........................................................................................................