From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=42997 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OENFK-0006Z6-Sv for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 May 2010 09:54:15 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OENFJ-00025Q-Gx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 May 2010 09:54:10 -0400 Received: from e7.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.137]:37538) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OENFF-00024n-PY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 May 2010 09:54:09 -0400 Received: from d01relay01.pok.ibm.com (d01relay01.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.233]) by e7.ny.us.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o4IDhVdh001000 for ; Tue, 18 May 2010 09:43:31 -0400 Received: from d01av02.pok.ibm.com (d01av02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.216]) by d01relay01.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id o4IDs4wv144312 for ; Tue, 18 May 2010 09:54:04 -0400 Received: from d01av02.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av02.pok.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id o4IDs37K019931 for ; Tue, 18 May 2010 10:54:03 -0300 Message-ID: <4BF29BF8.9020304@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 08:54:00 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1274186986-26878-1-git-send-email-corentincj@iksaif.net> <1274186986-26878-6-git-send-email-corentincj@iksaif.net> <4BF29AEE.8070602@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <4BF29AEE.8070602@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH v2 05/10] vnc: add basic tight support List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alexander Graf Cc: Corentin Chary , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Adam Litke On 05/18/2010 08:49 AM, Alexander Graf wrote: >> diff --git a/vnc.h b/vnc.h >> index 96f3fe7..ec7f481 100644 >> --- a/vnc.h >> +++ b/vnc.h >> @@ -166,6 +166,12 @@ struct VncState >> /* Tight */ >> uint8_t tight_quality; >> uint8_t tight_compression; >> + uint8_t tight_pixel24; >> + Buffer tight; >> + Buffer tight_tmp; >> + Buffer tight_zlib; >> + int tight_levels[4]; >> + z_stream tight_stream[4]; >> >> > You just shrunk down things to a single stream for zlib, so why go with > 4 here? Did I miss anything? > Tight requires 4 streams. Regards, Anthony Liguori > Alex > >