From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=47350 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OENJQ-00016m-P9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 May 2010 09:58:25 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OENJP-0002mf-4L for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 May 2010 09:58:24 -0400 Received: from e7.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.137]:38278) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OENJO-0002mT-NG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 May 2010 09:58:23 -0400 Received: from d01relay03.pok.ibm.com (d01relay03.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.235]) by e7.ny.us.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o4IDlmVw005691 for ; Tue, 18 May 2010 09:47:48 -0400 Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (d01av04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.64]) by d01relay03.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id o4IDwLo0125242 for ; Tue, 18 May 2010 09:58:21 -0400 Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av04.pok.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id o4IDwLsN003006 for ; Tue, 18 May 2010 09:58:21 -0400 Message-ID: <4BF29CFB.50902@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 08:58:19 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1274186986-26878-1-git-send-email-corentincj@iksaif.net> <1274186986-26878-4-git-send-email-corentincj@iksaif.net> <4BF28D5F.5010404@suse.de> <4BF2987F.4070609@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4BF29BB5.5020101@suse.de> <4BF29C59.4070101@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4BF29CA1.30203@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <4BF29CA1.30203@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH v2 03/10] vnc: only use a single zlib stream List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alexander Graf Cc: Corentin Chary , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Adam Litke On 05/18/2010 08:56 AM, Alexander Graf wrote: > So patch 4 is invalid? > Technically, yes although I'm not sure that it would necessarily break a client (since the client's request of compression levels is really just advisory). Regards, Anthony Liguori > Alex > >