From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=38848 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OEUgA-0008Tz-Oe for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 May 2010 17:50:25 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OEUg9-0007Ng-27 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 May 2010 17:50:22 -0400 Received: from mail-vw0-f45.google.com ([209.85.212.45]:51727) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OEUg7-0007NP-Jh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 May 2010 17:50:20 -0400 Received: by vws1 with SMTP id 1so2294619vws.4 for ; Tue, 18 May 2010 14:50:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4BF30B97.7080608@codemonkey.ws> Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 16:50:15 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for May 18 References: <20100518032346.GK4992@x200.localdomain> <4BF29BCF.4050805@codemonkey.ws> <20100518140927.GJ8328@redhat.com> <4BF2A55E.5030001@codemonkey.ws> <4BF2CEFD.20804@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4BF2CEFD.20804@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Avi Kivity Cc: Chris Wright , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org On 05/18/2010 12:31 PM, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 05/18/2010 05:34 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: >> >> No. I don't think our goal is to ever fully convert monitor commands >> to QMP. Some commands simply don't make sense as QMP commands (like >> x and xp). > > Examining memory does make sense for QMP, although it is already > available through the gdb protocol, so it's kind of redundant. The x and xp commands are meant to be used with all sorts of expressions. I agree examining memory makes sense but we certainly want a very different interface for it. Regards, Anthony Liguori