From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=51456 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OEmfW-0000uv-HQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 19 May 2010 13:02:55 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OEmfU-0005i9-8T for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 19 May 2010 13:02:54 -0400 Received: from e4.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.144]:36301) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OEmfT-0005hr-H9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 19 May 2010 13:02:52 -0400 Received: from d01relay03.pok.ibm.com (d01relay03.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.235]) by e4.ny.us.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id o4JGo90U023728 for ; Wed, 19 May 2010 12:50:09 -0400 Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (d03av01.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.167]) by d01relay03.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id o4JH2mRE164026 for ; Wed, 19 May 2010 13:02:48 -0400 Received: from d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av01.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id o4JH2d30005269 for ; Wed, 19 May 2010 11:02:39 -0600 Message-ID: <4BF419AD.2050902@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 12:02:37 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Bug Day - June 1st, 2010 References: <4BF316E3.6020002@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20100519115201.193e2efd@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20100519115201.193e2efd@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Luiz Capitulino Cc: qemu-devel , kvm-devel On 05/19/2010 09:52 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote: > On Tue, 18 May 2010 17:38:27 -0500 > Anthony Liguori wrote: > > >> Hi, >> >> In an effort to improve the 0.13 release quality, I'd like to host a Bug >> Day on June 1st, 2010. I've setup a quick wiki page with some more info >> (http://wiki.qemu.org/BugDay/June2010). >> > Tuesday is our call conf day and other people have reported that they have > more confs during that day. Suggest Jun 2. > I don't have a problem with the 2nd. >> Here's my basic thinking: >> >> - Anyone who can should try to spend some time either triaging bugs, >> updating bug status, or actually fixing bugs. >> > And testing, Fedora has a number of test cases already written, but > I guess that just a few are qemu specific: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2010-04-08_Virtualization > > We could link those and write our own, or at least list the major > features to be tested.. > > Of course we could have a different day for testing too, but I think > this is a way to get everyone busy. > Yup, I think it's a good suggestion. Please update the wiki if there's anything you'd like to add. >> - We'll have a special IRC channel (#qemu-bugday) on OFTC. As many >> QEMU and KVM developers as possible should join this channel for that >> day to help assist people working on bugs. >> - We'll try to migrate as many confirmable bugs from the Source Forge >> tracker to Launchpad. >> > Can't this be automated? > It could, but I think doing it manually could be helpful in culling bad bug reports. >> If this is successful, we'll try to have regular bug days. Any >> suggestions on how to make the experience as fun and productive as >> possible are certainly appreciated! >> > Lots of foods and a Monty Python session in the evening. > Of course :-) Regards, Anthony Liguori