From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=41837 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OErmL-0000kn-BW
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 19 May 2010 18:30:20 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1OErmF-000668-Gr
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 19 May 2010 18:30:15 -0400
Received: from mail-gw0-f45.google.com ([74.125.83.45]:59494)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1OErmF-00065w-4r
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 19 May 2010 18:30:11 -0400
Received: by gwj17 with SMTP id 17so3026640gwj.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Wed, 19 May 2010 15:30:10 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4BF4666F.4000905@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 17:30:07 -0500
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Bug Day - June 1st, 2010
References: <4BF316E3.6020002@linux.vnet.ibm.com>	<C6A6AA62-EDEC-43A4-8FB2-E6F0212705A3@claunia.com>	<20100519014531.GE2318@shareable.org>
	<4BF3E31E.70702@codemonkey.ws>
	<4BF3E577.8050005@msgid.tls.msk.ru> <4BF46639.9080109@amd.com>
In-Reply-To: <4BF46639.9080109@amd.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@amd.com>
Cc: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>

On 05/19/2010 05:29 PM, Andre Przywara wrote:
> Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> ...
>>
>> Also, thanks to Andre Przywara, whole winNT thing works but it requires
>> -cpu qemu64,level=1 (or level=2 or =3), -- _not_ with default CPU.  This
>> is also testing, but it's not obvious what to do witht the result...
> Can't we use the file based CPU models for that? Actually it looks 
> like a template config file for certain guest operation systems (like 
> -vga std -net nic,model=ne2k_pci for older Windows version) make 
> sense. These could include all quirks that we find on the way.

It'd be nice if we had more flexibility in defining custom machine types 
so you could just do qemu -M win98.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

> BTW: Does anyone knows what the problem with Windows95/98 on KVM is? I 
> tried some tracing today, but couldn't find a hint.
>
> Regards,
> Andre.
>