From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=34897 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OF5Ja-0003z7-J7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 20 May 2010 08:58:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OF5JD-0004JJ-Nr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 20 May 2010 08:57:30 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:53085) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OF5JC-0004Ia-7q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 20 May 2010 08:57:07 -0400 Message-ID: <4BF5319C.2030108@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 14:57:00 +0200 From: Gerd Hoffmann MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1273226987-10066-1-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1273226987-10066-1-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] vgabios plans ( Re: [PATCH 1/5] Makefile cleanup) List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" On 05/07/10 12:09, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > Use a single rule for building bios binaries. > Use target specific variables to set compile flags. > > This makes it more obvious what the differences between the versions > are. It also makes it easier to add new bios binaries with slightly > different settings. Hmm. No response for weeks from vgabios folks on this patch series. How to go forward best with vgabios bits? Just upgrade http://git.qemu.org/vgabios.git/ to 0.6c, then apply patches there? cheers, Gerd