From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=36128 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OF7Tv-0003cQ-VD
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 20 May 2010 11:16:49 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1OF7Ti-00038j-Nn
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 20 May 2010 11:16:15 -0400
Received: from mail-ww0-f45.google.com ([74.125.82.45]:46520)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1OF7Ti-00038a-Cg
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 20 May 2010 11:16:06 -0400
Received: by wwd20 with SMTP id 20so291819wwd.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 20 May 2010 08:16:05 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Paolo Bonzini <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4BF55231.8020208@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 17:16:01 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1274303733-3700-1-git-send-email-lcapitulino@redhat.com>	<1274303733-3700-3-git-send-email-lcapitulino@redhat.com>	<4BF45BCF.5090300@codemonkey.ws>
	<20100520104433.1be3167c@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20100520104433.1be3167c@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 2/6] json-lexer: Handle missing escapes
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Cc: aliguori@us.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On 05/20/2010 03:44 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
>   I think there's another issue in the handling of strings.
>
>   The spec says that valid unescaped chars are in the following range:
>
>      unescaped = %x20-21 / %x23-5B / %x5D-10FFFF
>
>   But we do:
>
>      [IN_DQ_STRING] = {
>          [1 ... 0xFF] = IN_DQ_STRING,
>          ['\\'] = IN_DQ_STRING_ESCAPE,
>          ['"'] = IN_DONE_STRING,
>      },
>
>   Shouldn't we cover 0x20 .. 0xFF instead?

If it's the lexer, isn't just it being liberal in what it accepts?

paolo