From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=38854 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OFVa0-0005I4-Gr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 21 May 2010 13:00:13 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OFVZs-0001UH-PO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 21 May 2010 13:00:11 -0400 Received: from are.twiddle.net ([75.149.56.221]:59055) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OFVZs-0001UA-Ge for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 21 May 2010 13:00:04 -0400 Received: from anchor.twiddle.home (anchor.twiddle.home [172.31.0.4]) by are.twiddle.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EA40E47 for ; Fri, 21 May 2010 10:00:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4BF6BC13.6040706@twiddle.net> Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 10:00:03 -0700 From: Richard Henderson MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] [S390] Remove warning in tcg stub (tcg_out_reloc) References: <1273595012-19587-1-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> <20100521164641.GA4989@volta.aurel32.net> In-Reply-To: <20100521164641.GA4989@volta.aurel32.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 05/21/2010 09:46 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote: >> + tcg_out_reloc(NULL, NULL, 0, 0, 0); >> } >> > > What about declaring tcg_out_reloc static inline? I think we're not far away from a mergable s390 port. I think the smallest local change is best in the interim. r~