From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=34263 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OFXoX-0001a4-S2
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 21 May 2010 15:23:22 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1OFXoW-00050o-CD
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 21 May 2010 15:23:21 -0400
Received: from mail-qy0-f173.google.com ([209.85.221.173]:33468)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1OFXoW-00050h-95
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 21 May 2010 15:23:20 -0400
Received: by qyk4 with SMTP id 4so1744669qyk.18
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Fri, 21 May 2010 12:23:19 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4BF6DDA1.90304@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 14:23:13 -0500
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Bug 453617] Re: kvm hangs at 100% cpu when
	connecting
	to forwarded ports (when listed incorrectly on the command line)
References: <20091017002811.3816.18618.malonedeb@gangotri.canonical.com>	<20100521115544.17238.22413.launchpad@loganberry.canonical.com>
	<20100521154252.GA12462@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20100521154252.GA12462@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Dustin Kirkland <kirkland@canonical.com>

On 05/21/2010 10:42 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>> ProblemType: Bug
>> Architecture: amd64
>> Date: Fri Oct 16 17:19:59 2009
>> DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
>>      
> What is the point forwarding distro bugs here? Can we have upstream bug
> tracker to report upstream issues?
>    

These bugs are being explicitly reported against upstream.  Launchpad 
can also track status against distros bugs (Fedora, Debian, Gentoo, 
Ubuntu, etc.).

It can be annoying is if a very Ubuntu (or other distribution) specific 
bug report is marked also affects upstream without a clear indication 
that this was in fact explicitly tested against upstream (and what 
specific version was tested).  This is something that we can fix though 
by just making protocol clear for this type of thing.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori


> --
> 			Gleb.
>
>