From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
To: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Cc: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/6] Make hpet a compile time option
Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 22:11:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BFADD5F.7010900@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3fx1huq8g.fsf@trasno.mitica>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2025 bytes --]
Juan Quintela wrote:
>>> We already have to disable hpet for 5.4 (1 year ago). It was done with
>>> a local hack because it was supposed that for next big release it would
>>> have been fixed.
>> But this remains a RHEL issue. Redhat decided to compile out features
>> that are unsupported, others seem to handle this differently.
>
> And then, everybody has a different hack to disable the features that
> they don't need. Instead of doing a local hack, we do a patch that
> allows anyone to disable HPET if it sees fit.
So far I only know of precisely one user that wants to disable x86
platform devices at build-time.
>
>>> Here we are, and device is still not fixed, what to do? Another local
>>> patch? Just get upstream to integrate a sane way to disable it and let
>>> in enable by default?
>> Let's start with listing your requirements to no longer disable HPET.
>
> It is not stable at this point in time :-( Running with --no-hpet is
> better than without it in all our testing. If we have to ask/modify
> everything to use --no-hpet, we can also compile-out it.
>
>> That would already help us to asses how long !CONFIG_HPET would actually
>> be of any use at all. I'm yet optimistic that we can resolve most if not
>> all remaining concerns for 0.13 - and CONFIG_HPET would at best be 0.13
>> material anyway.
>
> At this very point in time:
> - it is not stable
Well, that is helpful.
> - lack irq-reinjection when missing ticks
That is more helpful.
I just reworked the RTC regarding this, I guess it will be
straightforward to address it in the HPET too.
>
> (I was not the one debugging/testing this so I don't have more details,
> but can ask for them). So, it is not stable enough yet.
HPET is a fairly small device, a few hundred lines of code, only a few
ugly platform dependencies, but that's it already. I bet it could have
been fixed by now if someone just started by the time the tests reported
"it is not stable enough".
Jan
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 257 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-24 20:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-24 15:18 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/6] Make hpet a compile time option Juan Quintela
2010-05-24 15:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/6] Create again config-device.h and config.devices.h Juan Quintela
2010-05-24 15:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/6] Move no_hpet declaration to hpet_emul.h Juan Quintela
2010-05-24 15:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/6] Move no_hpet test to inside hpet_init() Juan Quintela
2010-05-24 15:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/6] Make hpet_in_legacy_mode() return 0 for !TARGET_I386 Juan Quintela
2010-05-24 15:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/6] make hpet_in_legacy_mode() return a bool Juan Quintela
2010-05-24 15:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/6] Create CONFIG_HPET Juan Quintela
2010-05-24 15:20 ` [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/6] Make hpet a compile time option Juan Quintela
2010-05-24 15:43 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-05-24 15:57 ` Juan Quintela
2010-05-24 16:20 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-05-24 18:08 ` Juan Quintela
2010-05-24 20:11 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2010-05-24 16:32 ` Paul Brook
2010-05-24 16:49 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-05-24 17:11 ` Paul Brook
2010-05-24 17:37 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-05-24 17:54 ` Juan Quintela
2010-05-24 18:03 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-05-24 18:15 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-05-24 20:16 ` Blue Swirl
2010-05-24 18:10 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-05-25 8:38 ` Paolo Bonzini
2010-05-25 9:05 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-05-25 9:56 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BFADD5F.7010900@web.de \
--to=jan.kiszka@web.de \
--cc=blauwirbel@gmail.com \
--cc=paul@codesourcery.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).