From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=47711 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OGrIo-00062B-I2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 25 May 2010 06:24:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OGrIn-0001KQ-84 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 25 May 2010 06:24:02 -0400 Received: from thoth.sbs.de ([192.35.17.2]:20672) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OGrIm-0001Jg-Ul for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 25 May 2010 06:24:01 -0400 Message-ID: <4BFBA539.6010305@siemens.com> Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 12:23:53 +0200 From: Jan Kiszka MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFT][PATCH 09/15] hpet/rtc: Rework RTC IRQ replacement by HPET References: <201005251029.49089.paul@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <201005251029.49089.paul@codesourcery.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paul Brook Cc: blue Swirl , Jan Kiszka , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , Juan Quintela Paul Brook wrote: >> for (i = 0; i < 24; i++) { >> sysbus_connect_irq(sysbus_from_qdev(hpet), i, isa_irq[i]); >> } >> + rtc_irq = qemu_allocate_feedback_irqs(hpet_handle_rtc_irq, >> + sysbus_from_qdev(hpet), 1); >> } > > This is wrong. The hpet device should expose this as an IO pin. Will look into this. BTW, I just realized that the GPIO handling is apparently lacking support for attaching an output to multiple inputs. Or am I missing something? Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1 Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux