From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=41864 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OGvdV-0002Cn-Fm
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 25 May 2010 11:01:42 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1OGvdU-0004bE-2C
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 25 May 2010 11:01:41 -0400
Received: from mail-vw0-f45.google.com ([209.85.212.45]:50129)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1OGvdT-0004b6-Q7
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 25 May 2010 11:01:40 -0400
Received: by vws6 with SMTP id 6so93869vws.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Tue, 25 May 2010 08:01:39 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4BFBE64F.6020901@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 10:01:35 -0500
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 1/1] ceph/rbd block driver for qemu-kvm
References: <20100519192222.GD61706@ncolin.muc.de>		<AANLkTimXqk7oa4mtcoHX1rKWzi_Nccb0FJu_QDtwJ-sP@mail.gmail.com>	<AANLkTil-aogxdnMallKTDo1bKXj6QmaU0ojJuiZgXaqC@mail.gmail.com>	<4BF5A9D2.5080609@codemonkey.ws>
	<4BF91937.2070801@redhat.com> <4BFBAE46.5050801@redhat.com>
	<4BFBB3C1.9020905@redhat.com> <4BFBCFAC.9070807@codemonkey.ws>
	<4BFBD13C.60605@redhat.com> <4BFBD20E.5060207@codemonkey.ws>
	<4BFBD2D5.2000201@redhat.com> <4BFBD6CD.3000503@codemonkey.ws>
	<4BFBD82F.3020404@redhat.com> <4BFBD943.8020704@codemonkey.ws>
	<4BFBE614.9080306@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <4BFBE614.9080306@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, Christian Brunner <chb@muc.de>

On 05/25/2010 10:00 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> The latter.  Why is it less important?  If you don't inherit the 
> memory, you can't access it.
>
>> You can also pass /dev/shm fd's via SCM_RIGHTs to establish shared 
>> memory segments dynamically.
>
> Doesn't work for anonymous memory.

What's wrong with /dev/shm memory?

Regards,

Anthony Liguori