From: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCHv2-RFC 0/2] virtio: put last seen used index into ring itself
Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 11:56:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BFF9366.5090103@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1274903328.git.mst@redhat.com>
On 05/26/10 21:50, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Here's a rewrite of the original patch with a new layout.
> I haven't tested it yet so no idea how this performs, but
> I think this addresses the cache bounce issue raised by Avi.
> Posting for early flames/comments.
>
> Generally, the Host end of the virtio ring doesn't need to see where
> Guest is up to in consuming the ring. However, to completely understand
> what's going on from the outside, this information must be exposed.
> For example, host can reduce the number of interrupts by detecting
> that the guest is currently handling previous buffers.
>
> We add a feature bit so the guest can tell the host that it's writing
> out the current value there, if it wants to use that.
>
> This differs from original approach in that the used index
> is put after avail index (they are typically written out together).
> To avoid cache bounces on descriptor access,
> and make future extensions easier, we put the ring itself at start of
> page, and move the control after it.
Hi Michael,
It looks pretty good to me, however one thing I have been thinking of
while reading through it:
Rather than storing a pointer within the ring struct, pointing into a
position within the same struct. How about storing a byte offset instead
and using a cast to get to the pointer position? That would avoid the
pointer dereference, which is less effective cache wise and harder for
the CPU to predict.
Not sure whether it really matters performance wise, just a thought.
Cheers,
Jes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-28 9:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-26 19:50 [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv2-RFC 0/2] virtio: put last seen used index into ring itself Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-05-26 19:50 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv2-RFC 1/2] virtio: support layout with avail ring before idx Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-05-26 19:50 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv2-RFC 2/2] virtio: publish used idx Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-05-27 12:07 ` [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCHv2-RFC 0/2] virtio: put last seen used index into ring itself Avi Kivity
2010-05-27 13:59 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-05-28 9:56 ` Jes Sorensen [this message]
2010-05-30 11:22 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-05-31 7:36 ` Jes Sorensen
2010-05-31 13:29 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-05-31 7:46 ` Rusty Russell
2010-05-31 12:20 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-06-02 20:39 ` Jes Sorensen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BFF9366.5090103@redhat.com \
--to=jes.sorensen@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).