From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=59367 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OJ4T3-0001mH-OJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 31 May 2010 08:51:47 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OJ4Sq-0000s7-7q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 31 May 2010 08:51:33 -0400 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.152]:28411) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OJ4Sq-0000re-3Y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 31 May 2010 08:51:32 -0400 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so576463fgg.10 for ; Mon, 31 May 2010 05:51:30 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <4C03B0CE.3040102@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 14:51:26 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20100530155000.GA30051@redhat.com> <20100530180545.GA30132@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PULL] pci, vhost fixes List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Blue Swirl Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" On 05/30/2010 08:19 PM, Blue Swirl wrote: > We have PRI*64 just for this purpose, so let's use them. The > discussion about that was earlier. How does mingw matter for vhost-net specific code? Paolo