From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=55390 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OJSHa-0006Ch-OW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 01 Jun 2010 10:17:32 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OJSHY-0002p5-AX for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 01 Jun 2010 10:17:30 -0400 Received: from zion.dlh.net ([91.198.192.1]:59811 helo=mail.dlh.net) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OJSHY-0002oW-61 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 01 Jun 2010 10:17:28 -0400 Message-ID: <4C051669.4060209@dlh.net> Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2010 16:17:13 +0200 From: Peter Lieven MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: disable clocksource=kvm-clock References: <4C050743.3030603@dlh.net> <4C05087A.9090803@redhat.com> <4C0511BC.7080803@dlh.net> <4C0512AA.6060906@redhat.com> <4C0513DB.1080108@dlh.net> <4C0514C6.3060203@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <4C0514C6.3060203@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Avi Kivity Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org Avi Kivity wrote: > On 06/01/2010 05:06 PM, Peter Lieven wrote: >> >> avi, i do not know whats going on. but if i supply -cpu xxx,-kvmclock >> the guest >> still uses kvm-clock, but it seems bug #584516 is not triggered... >> thats weird... > > I guess that bug was resolved in qemu-kvm.git. Likely 1a03675db1, but > it appears to be part of 0.12 too, so not sure. > > What qemu-kvm were you using previously? > i'm using qemu-kvm git from today (aa22e82). bug #585113 seems to be fixed (this was the irq nobody cared error with virtio_blk or e1000) bug #584516 is still there, but if I set - cpu xxx,-kvmclock it is not triggered. the guest shows current_clocksource = kvm_clock, but migration seems to succeed (at least the ~20 times i tested it since you told me about the flag) do you have a clue what fixed bug #585113. i would like to backport it to 0.12.4